Close Menu
DemocracyGuyana.comDemocracyGuyana.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest news from DemocracyGuyana.com

    What's Hot

    Lewis’ tiresome incantations have become boring

    July 1, 2025

    The value of changes in political allegiance

    July 1, 2025

    Spotlight

    June 29, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About DG
    • Join as Volunteers
    • Become a Member
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    DemocracyGuyana.comDemocracyGuyana.com
    Jet Global Airways
    • Home
    • Diaspora
    • Guyana News
    • Global News
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Business Opportunities
    • Advertise with us
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
    • World Newspapers
    • Contact Us
    DemocracyGuyana.comDemocracyGuyana.com
    Home»Featured»Response to Ramesh Gampat
    Featured

    Response to Ramesh Gampat

    Joel BhagwandinBy Joel BhagwandinNo Comments4 Mins Read36,684 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Joel Bhagwandin
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Reference is made to Dr. Ramesh Gampat’s letter in the October 9thedition of the Stabroek News, with the caption “data on arrivals and departures cannot prove whether or not Guyanese are leaving permanently abroad”. Dr. Rampat wrote, “I wonder what prompted Joel Bhagwandin’s crafty and deceptive letter, which claims to enlighten us about migration.” Dr. Rampat was referring to part I of an essay written by this author about “migration”, framed within the context of, “to what extent are Guyanese migrating currently, compared to the level of mass migration in the 1980s and 1990s”.

    By the time this response hits the media, part II was already published in sections of the media, thus, I need not regurgitate the contents of part II herein.However,I would like to address Dr. Rampat’s argument on the subject, especially since he did not have the benefit of part II to consider in his response,and more so, whether his response would have been warranted.

    In part I, it was explained that to reasonably ascertain whether or not the level of migration occurring in the “current situational context” of the country is higher or lower than the level of mass migration that occurred in the 1980s-90s, an answer can be extrapolatedthus, from the arrivals and departures dataset for the two international airports. The difference between these twonumbers (arrivals and departures) is equal to the net arrival or net departure rate. It is important tohighlight that I never said that this is equal to the net migration rate. The net migration rate is a different metric and concept altogether, but in the absence of the net migration rate dataset, the net arrival/departure metric wasused to extrapolate.

    Of note, extrapolation does not necessarily lead to a concretized empirically based conclusion owing to the limitations of this technique. This is how extrapolatory technique works in research and analysis.It is a technique employed when there is limited and/orthe absence of precise and more granular dataset (s) needed for research and analysis purposes. Simply put, it is a technique using “known data” to understand, ascertain or predict the “unknown” data. Therefore, by employing this technique and acknowledging its limitations, the findings derived therefromwould always be subject to debate and varying interpretations, which is completely understood and perfectly in order.

    With that in mind, Dr. Rampat asserted that the net arrivals dataset was inappropriate to derive the conclusion I arrived at. Yet, interestingly, Dr. Rampat may have contradicted one of his own, old academic pieces of work on the very subject of migration. To this end, in his self-published book titled “Essays, Guyana: Economics, Politics and Demography”, he utilized the same metric to make the same conclusion and/or argumentations, but he did so incorrectly, in that, he conflated the two concepts.

    On page 531 of the said book, table 19.3 (refer to the image below for ease of reference), he presented the arrival and departure data from the two international airports for the period 2000-2018. He then subtracted the arrival data from the departure data, of which the result he referred to as the net migration rate for Guyana. But this was incorrect. The net migration rate is NOT the difference between arrivals and departures, rather it is derived from the difference between the total number emigrants and immigrants. Further, the only credible and authoritative database that contains this data is the World Bank/United Nations’ net migration rates.

    Worthy of note, in part II, I was able to locate the World Bank’s net migration rates’ database, which showed that in the case of Guyana, over the period 1966-2023, the net migration rate observed in 2023, was six times lower than where it was in the 1980s-90s period. This means that the net migration rate has been declining over the years, which is a positive signal for the country.

    In conclusion, Dr. Rampat’s self-inflicted contradictions suggests that he was being academically unethical by virtue of him employing the same technique as I have demonstrated in part I, withthe same dataset, albeit incorrectly in his case,but opted to discredit mineafter having used the same technique and dataset as he did in the past, but not incorrectly as he did (i.e., conflating the net migration rate with that of the net arrivals/departures rate).

    DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Democracyguyana, an online newspaper.
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Joel Bhagwandin
    Joel Bhagwandin

    Related Posts

    Lewis’ tiresome incantations have become boring

    The value of changes in political allegiance

    Spotlight

    THE PNC AND THE AFC’S JOINT ATTACK AGAINST SUGAR AGAIN – ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL

    Guyana’s Rise as a Global Oil Power: Why a Local Refinery Is Urgent and Essential

    Azruddin Mohamed’s WIN Party Is Just a Get-Out-of-Jail Card: A Desperate PR Stunt by a Sanctioned Gold Smuggler, Money Launderer, and Invoice Manipulator Caught Red-Handed by OFAC, the FBI, and Guyana’s Tax Authorities.

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    What do you make of it? by Leonard Craig

    November 18, 2024744K Views

    President Irfaan Ali Emphasises Discipline and Accountability Over Project Delays

    November 13, 2024566K Views

    The Hollow Ambitions of Nigel Hughes: A Political Opportunist and Exhibitionist with Empty Promises.

    July 11, 2024100K Views
    Don't Miss

    Lewis’ tiresome incantations have become boring

    The departure from the PNC-led APNU is moving from a trickle to a tsunami. By…

    The value of changes in political allegiance

    July 1, 2025

    Spotlight

    June 29, 2025

    THE PNC AND THE AFC’S JOINT ATTACK AGAINST SUGAR AGAIN – ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL

    June 28, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    72

    Over 50 poisoned at wedding in Iraq

    8.9

    EAM Jaishankar Meets Guyanese PM Mark Phillips, Discuss Energy, Disaster Resilience And Defence Cooperation

    Most Popular

    What do you make of it? by Leonard Craig

    November 18, 2024744K Views

    President Irfaan Ali Emphasises Discipline and Accountability Over Project Delays

    November 13, 2024566K Views

    The Hollow Ambitions of Nigel Hughes: A Political Opportunist and Exhibitionist with Empty Promises.

    July 11, 2024100K Views
    Our Picks

    Lewis’ tiresome incantations have become boring

    July 1, 2025

    The value of changes in political allegiance

    July 1, 2025

    Spotlight

    June 29, 2025
    Popular Categories
    • Global News
    • Election Rigging
    • Sports
    • Special News
    Do you want to associate with us
    • Business Opportunities
    • Advertise with us
    • Contact Us
    • www.democracyguyana.com Guyana – London – India

      For more information, contact us.
    DemocracyGuyana.com
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    • About DG
    • Become a Member
    • Join as Volunteers
    • Forum
    • Advertise with us
    DG BRANCHES: GUYANA, USA, CANADA, UK, CARIBBEAN, AND INDIA
    © 2025 DemocracyGuyana.com.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.