Unlike the PPP/Cโs housing policy, which allows new homeowners to access ๐ ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ด๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ณ (๐ ๐๐ฅ) and benefit from what is effectively an ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐-๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ด๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ, APNUโs plan locks people into a deal with hidden costs.

๐ก๐ผ ๐ ๐๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ โ Rent-to-own buyers would lose out on millions $$ in savings that PPP/C homeowners enjoy.

๐๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ โ APNUโs plan hides the costs in the rent, eroding affordability over time. For example, on a loan value of $10 million @ 5% interest maturing in 20 years, monthly instalment will be around $65,995. This implies an annual interest payment of $292k, or $5.838 million over the life of the loan. This means that under the PPP/C’s current housing policy, on a loan of $10 million, first time home owners stand to save close to $6 million in interest payments over the life of the loan. Conversely, under what APNU proposes, imagine paying a monthly rent of $66,000 for a $10M residential property, you will effectively be paying close to $6 million in interest payments (implicitly).

๐ก๐ผ ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ โ As principal balances are written down, homeowners cannot leverage the value of their home to secure capital for business ventures or personal growth.
In other words, APNUโs โpolicyโ isnโt empowering โ itโs disempowering.
In contrast, the PPP/C continues to deliver ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ, ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐๐น๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐ต๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐.